New Zealand vs Serbia: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
New Zealand
3.77 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Serbia
3.85 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand rank
49th
Serbia rank
48th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- New Zealand
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3.85 DB16-20 methodology against 3.77 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand, a difference of 0.08 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 48th of 127 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, New Zealand or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 3.85 DB16-20 methodology against 3.77 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between New Zealand and Serbia?
- 0.08 DB16-20 methodology, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Serbia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- New Zealand ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 48th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.