New Zealand vs Sri Lanka: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
New Zealand
3.77 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Sri Lanka
4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand rank
49th
Sri Lanka rank
46th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- New Zealand
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 4 DB16-20 methodology against 3.77 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand, a difference of 0.23 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 49th and Sri Lanka ranks 46th of 127 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, New Zealand or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 4 DB16-20 methodology against 3.77 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between New Zealand and Sri Lanka?
- 0.23 DB16-20 methodology, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sri Lanka?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Sri Lanka rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- New Zealand ranks 49th and Sri Lanka ranks 46th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.