Palau vs Papua New Guinea: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
Palau
615.7 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
940 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Palau rank
2nd
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- Palau
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 940 DB16-20 methodology against 615.7 DB16-20 methodology in Palau, a difference of 324.3 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Palau's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Palau ranks 2nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 126 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Palau or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 940 DB16-20 methodology against 615.7 DB16-20 methodology in Palau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Palau and Papua New Guinea?
- 324.3 DB16-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Palau and Papua New Guinea rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Palau ranks 2nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.