Russian Federation vs Slovenia: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
Russian Federation
0.182 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Slovenia
0.13 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
119th
Slovenia rank
121st
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- Russian Federation
- Slovenia
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 0.182 DB16-20 methodology against 0.13 DB16-20 methodology in Slovenia, a difference of 0.052 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.4 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Slovenia ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 119th and Slovenia ranks 121st of 126 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Russian Federation or Slovenia?
- Russian Federation, at 0.182 DB16-20 methodology against 0.13 DB16-20 methodology in Slovenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Russian Federation and Slovenia?
- 0.052 DB16-20 methodology, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Slovenia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and Slovenia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Russian Federation ranks 119th and Slovenia ranks 121st of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.