Taiwan, China vs Uzbekistan: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
Taiwan, China
0.27 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Uzbekistan
0.22 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Taiwan, China rank
113th
Uzbekistan rank
116th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- Taiwan, China
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Taiwan, China currently reports 0.27 DB16-20 methodology against 0.22 DB16-20 methodology in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.05 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Taiwan, China's figure about 1.2 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Taiwan, China ranks 113th and Uzbekistan ranks 116th of 126 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Taiwan, China or Uzbekistan?
- Taiwan, China, at 0.27 DB16-20 methodology against 0.22 DB16-20 methodology in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Taiwan, China and Uzbekistan?
- 0.05 DB16-20 methodology, with Taiwan, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Taiwan, China and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Taiwan, China and Uzbekistan rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Taiwan, China ranks 113th and Uzbekistan ranks 116th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.