Botswana vs Iran, Islamic Rep.: Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score

Botswana
74.35
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Rep.
74.35
in 2019
Botswana rank
103rd
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
103rd

Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Botswana
  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
020406080200920142019

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 74.35 against 74.35 in Iran, Islamic Rep., a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Rep. has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 103rd and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 103rd of 188 countries.

Iran, Islamic Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Iran, Islamic Rep. Difference Ahead
2000s 55.22 60 4.78 Iran, Islamic Rep.
2010s 64.78 67.17 2.39 Iran, Islamic Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: time (days) - score, Botswana or Iran, Islamic Rep.?
Botswana, at 74.35 against 74.35 in Iran, Islamic Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: time (days) - score between Botswana and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
0, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Botswana and Iran, Islamic Rep. rank globally for getting electricity: time (days) - score?
Botswana ranks 103rd and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 103rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.