Central African Republic vs Mexico: Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score

Central African Republic
65.22
in 2019
Mexico
64.16
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
134th
Mexico rank
137th

Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Mexico
0204060200920142019

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 65.22 against 64.16 in Mexico, a difference of 1.06.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 134th and Mexico ranks 137th of 188 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s 33.04 0 33.04 Central African Republic
2010s 61.3 57.67 3.63 Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: time (days) - score, Central African Republic or Mexico?
Central African Republic, at 65.22 against 64.16 in Mexico as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: time (days) - score between Central African Republic and Mexico?
1.06, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mexico?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Central African Republic and Mexico rank globally for getting electricity: time (days) - score?
Central African Republic ranks 134th and Mexico ranks 137th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.