Central African Republic vs Sri Lanka: Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score
Central African Republic
65.22
in 2019
Sri Lanka
64.35
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
136th
Sri Lanka rank
138th
Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 65.22 against 64.35 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.87.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 136th and Sri Lanka ranks 138th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.04 | 53.04 | 20 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 61.3 | 60.61 | 0.6957 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: time (days) - score, Central African Republic or Sri Lanka?
- Central African Republic, at 65.22 against 64.35 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: time (days) - score between Central African Republic and Sri Lanka?
- 0.87, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Sri Lanka?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Sri Lanka rank globally for getting electricity: time (days) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 136th and Sri Lanka ranks 138th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.