Costa Rica vs Mozambique, Republic of: Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score
Costa Rica
90.87
in 2019
Mozambique, Republic of
90.43
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
34th
Mozambique, Republic of rank
37th
Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Mozambique, Republic of
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 90.87 against 90.43 in Mozambique, Republic of, a difference of 0.44.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mozambique, Republic of ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 34th and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 37th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique, Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mozambique, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.87 | 87.39 | 6.52 | Mozambique, Republic of |
| 2010s | 85.13 | 79.87 | 5.26 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: time (days) - score, Costa Rica or Mozambique, Republic of?
- Costa Rica, at 90.87 against 90.43 in Mozambique, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: time (days) - score between Costa Rica and Mozambique, Republic of?
- 0.44, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mozambique, Republic of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Mozambique, Republic of rank globally for getting electricity: time (days) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 34th and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 37th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.