Dominican Republic vs Mauritius: Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score

Dominican Republic
78.7
in 2019
Mauritius
78.7
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
81st
Mauritius rank
81st

Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Mauritius
020406080200920142019

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 78.7 against 78.7 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 81st and Mauritius ranks 81st of 188 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 72.17 64.78 7.39 Dominican Republic
2010s 74.78 69.61 5.17 Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: time (days) - score, Dominican Republic or Mauritius?
Dominican Republic, at 78.7 against 78.7 in Mauritius as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: time (days) - score between Dominican Republic and Mauritius?
0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Mauritius?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Dominican Republic and Mauritius rank globally for getting electricity: time (days) - score?
Dominican Republic ranks 81st and Mauritius ranks 81st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.