Gambia vs Micronesia (country): Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score

Gambia
63.91
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
62.17
in 2019
Gambia rank
138th
Micronesia (country) rank
141st

Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Gambia
  • Micronesia (country)
0204060200920142019

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 63.91 against 62.17 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 1.74.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.

Gambia ranks 138th and Micronesia (country) ranks 141st of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Micronesia (country) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
2000s 20.43 62.17 41.74 Micronesia (country)
2010s 59.57 55.96 3.61 Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: time (days) - score, Gambia or Micronesia (country)?
Gambia, at 63.91 against 62.17 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: time (days) - score between Gambia and Micronesia (country)?
1.74, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Micronesia (country)?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Gambia and Micronesia (country) rank globally for getting electricity: time (days) - score?
Gambia ranks 138th and Micronesia (country) ranks 141st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.