Iceland vs United Arab Emirates: Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score

Iceland
98.26
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
100
in 2019
Iceland rank
4th
United Arab Emirates rank
1st

Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Iceland
  • United Arab Emirates
020406080100200920142019

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 100 against 98.26 in Iceland, a difference of 1.74.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 4th and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2000s 98.26 83.91 14.35 Iceland
2010s 98.26 93.3 4.96 Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: time (days) - score, Iceland or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 100 against 98.26 in Iceland as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: time (days) - score between Iceland and United Arab Emirates?
1.74, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and United Arab Emirates?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Iceland and United Arab Emirates rank globally for getting electricity: time (days) - score?
Iceland ranks 4th and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.