Iraq vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score
Iraq
85.65
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
85.22
in 2019
Iraq rank
51st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
53rd
Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score over time
- Iraq
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 85.65 against 85.22 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.43.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Iraq ranks 51st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.22 | 85.22 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 82.78 | 85.22 | 2.43 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: time (days) - score, Iraq or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Iraq, at 85.65 against 85.22 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: time (days) - score between Iraq and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.43, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Iraq and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for getting electricity: time (days) - score?
- Iraq ranks 51st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.