St. Kitts and Nevis vs Taiwan Province of China: Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score
St. Kitts and Nevis
100
in 2019
Taiwan Province of China
98.26
in 2019
St. Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Taiwan Province of China rank
4th
Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score over time
- St. Kitts and Nevis
- Taiwan Province of China
How they compare
St. Kitts and Nevis currently reports 100 against 98.26 in Taiwan Province of China, a difference of 1.74.
Across all 11 years both countries report, St. Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Taiwan Province of China ranks 4th of 190 countries.
St. Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | St. Kitts and Nevis | Taiwan Province of China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 97.39 | 2.61 | St. Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 100 | 97.83 | 2.17 | St. Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: time (days) - score, St. Kitts and Nevis or Taiwan Province of China?
- St. Kitts and Nevis, at 100 against 98.26 in Taiwan Province of China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: time (days) - score between St. Kitts and Nevis and Taiwan Province of China?
- 1.74, with St. Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for St. Kitts and Nevis and Taiwan Province of China?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do St. Kitts and Nevis and Taiwan Province of China rank globally for getting electricity: time (days) - score?
- St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Taiwan Province of China ranks 4th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.