Chinese Taipei vs Uzbekistan: Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per
Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per over time
- Chinese Taipei
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Chinese Taipei ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per, Chinese Taipei or Uzbekistan?
- Chinese Taipei, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per between Chinese Taipei and Uzbekistan?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chinese Taipei and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chinese Taipei and Uzbekistan rank globally for getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per?
- Chinese Taipei ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per customer a year (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The total duration and frequency of outages per customer a year index evaluates the quality of the power supply. If SAIDI and SAIFI are 12 (equivalent to an outage of one hour each month) or below, a score of 1 is assigned. If SAIDI and SAIFI are 4 (equivalent to an outage of one hour each quarter) or below, 1 additional point is assigned. If SAIDI and SAIFI are 1 (equivalent to an outage of one hour per year) or below, 1 more point is assigned. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.