Afghanistan vs Congo: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Afghanistan
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 41.88 DB10-14 methodology against 40.2 DB10-14 methodology in Afghanistan, a difference of 1.68 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 179th and Congo ranks 177th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.69 DB10-14 methodology | 38.39 DB10-14 methodology | 1.3 DB10-14 methodology | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 38.97 DB10-14 methodology | 39.28 DB10-14 methodology | 0.3101 DB10-14 methodology | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Afghanistan or Congo?
- Congo, at 41.88 DB10-14 methodology against 40.2 DB10-14 methodology in Afghanistan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Afghanistan and Congo?
- 1.68 DB10-14 methodology, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Congo?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Afghanistan and Congo rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Afghanistan ranks 179th and Congo ranks 177th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.