Argentina vs Cambodia: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Argentina
- Cambodia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 56.22 DB10-14 methodology against 55.33 DB10-14 methodology in Cambodia, a difference of 0.89 DB10-14 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 130th and Cambodia ranks 133rd of 184 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.81 DB10-14 methodology | 53.24 DB10-14 methodology | 4.57 DB10-14 methodology | Argentina |
| 2010s | 57.02 DB10-14 methodology | 54.62 DB10-14 methodology | 2.4 DB10-14 methodology | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Argentina or Cambodia?
- Argentina, at 56.22 DB10-14 methodology against 55.33 DB10-14 methodology in Cambodia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Argentina and Cambodia?
- 0.89 DB10-14 methodology, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cambodia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Argentina and Cambodia rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Argentina ranks 130th and Cambodia ranks 133rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.