Azerbaijan vs Ghana: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Azerbaijan
- Ghana
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 65.6 DB10-14 methodology against 64.89 DB10-14 methodology in Ghana, a difference of 0.71 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 67th and Ghana ranks 69th of 184 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.26 DB10-14 methodology | 58.21 DB10-14 methodology | 4.05 DB10-14 methodology | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 64.09 DB10-14 methodology | 63.2 DB10-14 methodology | 0.8852 DB10-14 methodology | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Azerbaijan or Ghana?
- Azerbaijan, at 65.6 DB10-14 methodology against 64.89 DB10-14 methodology in Ghana as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Azerbaijan and Ghana?
- 0.71 DB10-14 methodology, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Ghana?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Azerbaijan and Ghana rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Azerbaijan ranks 67th and Ghana ranks 69th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.