Bangladesh vs Guinea: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Bangladesh
- Guinea
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 46.25 DB10-14 methodology against 46.19 DB10-14 methodology in Guinea, a difference of 0.06 DB10-14 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 167th and Guinea ranks 168th of 184 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.3 DB10-14 methodology | 38.68 DB10-14 methodology | 6.62 DB10-14 methodology | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 45.93 DB10-14 methodology | 41.72 DB10-14 methodology | 4.21 DB10-14 methodology | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Bangladesh or Guinea?
- Bangladesh, at 46.25 DB10-14 methodology against 46.19 DB10-14 methodology in Guinea as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Bangladesh and Guinea?
- 0.06 DB10-14 methodology, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Bangladesh and Guinea rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Bangladesh ranks 167th and Guinea ranks 168th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.