Botswana vs Luxembourg: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Botswana
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 66.88 DB10-14 methodology against 66.53 DB10-14 methodology in Botswana, a difference of 0.35 DB10-14 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 62nd and Luxembourg ranks 60th of 184 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.08 DB10-14 methodology | 66.49 DB10-14 methodology | 3.42 DB10-14 methodology | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 64.87 DB10-14 methodology | 66.8 DB10-14 methodology | 1.93 DB10-14 methodology | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Botswana or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 66.88 DB10-14 methodology against 66.53 DB10-14 methodology in Botswana as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Botswana and Luxembourg?
- 0.35 DB10-14 methodology, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Luxembourg?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Botswana and Luxembourg rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Botswana ranks 62nd and Luxembourg ranks 60th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.