Burkina Faso vs Mauritania: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 46.64 DB10-14 methodology against 46.49 DB10-14 methodology in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.15 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mauritania ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 164th and Mauritania ranks 163rd of 184 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.62 DB10-14 methodology | 41.82 DB10-14 methodology | 0.199 DB10-14 methodology | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 45.11 DB10-14 methodology | 45.31 DB10-14 methodology | 0.1925 DB10-14 methodology | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Burkina Faso or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 46.64 DB10-14 methodology against 46.49 DB10-14 methodology in Burkina Faso as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Burkina Faso and Mauritania?
- 0.15 DB10-14 methodology, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Mauritania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Burkina Faso and Mauritania rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 164th and Mauritania ranks 163rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.