Chad vs Eritrea: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Chad
- Eritrea
How they compare
Chad currently reports 33.58 DB10-14 methodology against 33.03 DB10-14 methodology in Eritrea, a difference of 0.55 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Eritrea ahead.
Chad ranks 181st and Eritrea ranks 182nd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.42 DB10-14 methodology | 30.43 DB10-14 methodology | 0.012 DB10-14 methodology | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 32.35 DB10-14 methodology | 32.3 DB10-14 methodology | 0.0573 DB10-14 methodology | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Chad or Eritrea?
- Chad, at 33.58 DB10-14 methodology against 33.03 DB10-14 methodology in Eritrea as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Chad and Eritrea?
- 0.55 DB10-14 methodology, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eritrea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Chad and Eritrea rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Chad ranks 181st and Eritrea ranks 182nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.