Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Congo
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 43.14 DB10-14 methodology against 41.88 DB10-14 methodology in Congo, a difference of 1.26 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 177th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 175th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.39 DB10-14 methodology | 33.53 DB10-14 methodology | 4.86 DB10-14 methodology | Congo |
| 2010s | 39.28 DB10-14 methodology | 39.54 DB10-14 methodology | 0.2622 DB10-14 methodology | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Congo or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 43.14 DB10-14 methodology against 41.88 DB10-14 methodology in Congo as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
- 1.26 DB10-14 methodology, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Congo and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Congo ranks 177th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 175th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.