Cote d'Ivoire vs Madagascar: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 48.07 DB10-14 methodology against 47.93 DB10-14 methodology in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.14 DB10-14 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 156th and Madagascar ranks 155th of 184 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.19 DB10-14 methodology | 46.98 DB10-14 methodology | 5.79 DB10-14 methodology | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 44.42 DB10-14 methodology | 47.65 DB10-14 methodology | 3.23 DB10-14 methodology | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Cote d'Ivoire or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 48.07 DB10-14 methodology against 47.93 DB10-14 methodology in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Cote d'Ivoire and Madagascar?
- 0.14 DB10-14 methodology, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Madagascar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Madagascar rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 156th and Madagascar ranks 155th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.