Denmark vs Hong Kong: Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology)
Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology) over time
- Denmark
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 86.36 DB10-14 methodology against 84.32 DB10-14 methodology in Denmark, a difference of 2.04 DB10-14 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 5th and Hong Kong ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.58 DB10-14 methodology | 86.06 DB10-14 methodology | 3.49 DB10-14 methodology | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 84.32 DB10-14 methodology | 86.7 DB10-14 methodology | 2.38 DB10-14 methodology | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Denmark or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 86.36 DB10-14 methodology against 84.32 DB10-14 methodology in Denmark as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Denmark and Hong Kong?
- 2.04 DB10-14 methodology, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Hong Kong?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Denmark and Hong Kong rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Denmark ranks 5th and Hong Kong ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.