Denmark vs United States: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Denmark
- United States
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 84.32 DB10-14 methodology against 83.48 DB10-14 methodology in United States, a difference of 0.84 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was United States ahead.
Denmark ranks 5th and United States ranks 6th of 184 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.58 DB10-14 methodology | 86.28 DB10-14 methodology | 3.7 DB10-14 methodology | United States |
| 2010s | 84.32 DB10-14 methodology | 85.17 DB10-14 methodology | 0.8552 DB10-14 methodology | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Denmark or United States?
- Denmark, at 84.32 DB10-14 methodology against 83.48 DB10-14 methodology in United States as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Denmark and United States?
- 0.84 DB10-14 methodology, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and United States?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Denmark and United States rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Denmark ranks 5th and United States ranks 6th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.