Ecuador vs Jordan: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Ecuador
- Jordan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 57.74 DB10-14 methodology against 57.55 DB10-14 methodology in Jordan, a difference of 0.19 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 122nd and Jordan ranks 124th of 184 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.28 DB10-14 methodology | 56.34 DB10-14 methodology | 0.9425 DB10-14 methodology | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 57.5 DB10-14 methodology | 57.36 DB10-14 methodology | 0.1386 DB10-14 methodology | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Ecuador or Jordan?
- Ecuador, at 57.74 DB10-14 methodology against 57.55 DB10-14 methodology in Jordan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Ecuador and Jordan?
- 0.19 DB10-14 methodology, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jordan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Ecuador and Jordan rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Ecuador ranks 122nd and Jordan ranks 124th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.