Equatorial Guinea vs Malawi: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Malawi
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 47.76 DB10-14 methodology against 47.09 DB10-14 methodology in Malawi, a difference of 0.67 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Malawi ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 158th and Malawi ranks 161st of 184 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.63 DB10-14 methodology | 48.9 DB10-14 methodology | 3.28 DB10-14 methodology | Malawi |
| 2010s | 46.96 DB10-14 methodology | 48.92 DB10-14 methodology | 1.97 DB10-14 methodology | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Equatorial Guinea or Malawi?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 47.76 DB10-14 methodology against 47.09 DB10-14 methodology in Malawi as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Equatorial Guinea and Malawi?
- 0.67 DB10-14 methodology, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Malawi?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Malawi rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 158th and Malawi ranks 161st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.