Greece vs Kyrgyzstan: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Greece
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Greece currently reports 63.4 DB10-14 methodology against 63.23 DB10-14 methodology in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.17 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 80th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.81 DB10-14 methodology | 59.2 DB10-14 methodology | 2.62 DB10-14 methodology | Greece |
| 2010s | 61.38 DB10-14 methodology | 61.95 DB10-14 methodology | 0.5671 DB10-14 methodology | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Greece or Kyrgyzstan?
- Greece, at 63.4 DB10-14 methodology against 63.23 DB10-14 methodology in Kyrgyzstan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Greece and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.17 DB10-14 methodology, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Greece and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Greece ranks 80th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.