Grenada vs Solomon Islands: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Grenada
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 59.59 DB10-14 methodology against 59.04 DB10-14 methodology in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.55 DB10-14 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 111th and Solomon Islands ranks 114th of 184 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.4 DB10-14 methodology | 51.66 DB10-14 methodology | 6.74 DB10-14 methodology | Grenada |
| 2010s | 59.57 DB10-14 methodology | 58.21 DB10-14 methodology | 1.36 DB10-14 methodology | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Grenada or Solomon Islands?
- Grenada, at 59.59 DB10-14 methodology against 59.04 DB10-14 methodology in Solomon Islands as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Grenada and Solomon Islands?
- 0.55 DB10-14 methodology, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Solomon Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Grenada and Solomon Islands rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Grenada ranks 111th and Solomon Islands ranks 114th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.