Guatemala vs Uruguay: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Guatemala
- Uruguay
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 63.88 DB10-14 methodology against 63.64 DB10-14 methodology in Uruguay, a difference of 0.24 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 76th and Uruguay ranks 78th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.35 DB10-14 methodology | 58.99 DB10-14 methodology | 1.36 DB10-14 methodology | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 61.55 DB10-14 methodology | 62.04 DB10-14 methodology | 0.4883 DB10-14 methodology | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Guatemala or Uruguay?
- Guatemala, at 63.88 DB10-14 methodology against 63.64 DB10-14 methodology in Uruguay as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Guatemala and Uruguay?
- 0.24 DB10-14 methodology, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Guatemala and Uruguay rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Guatemala ranks 76th and Uruguay ranks 78th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.