Guinea vs Tajikistan: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Guinea
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 46.19 DB10-14 methodology against 45.17 DB10-14 methodology in Tajikistan, a difference of 1.02 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Guinea ranks 168th and Tajikistan ranks 171st of 184 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.68 DB10-14 methodology | 40.63 DB10-14 methodology | 1.96 DB10-14 methodology | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 41.72 DB10-14 methodology | 44.2 DB10-14 methodology | 2.48 DB10-14 methodology | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Guinea or Tajikistan?
- Guinea, at 46.19 DB10-14 methodology against 45.17 DB10-14 methodology in Tajikistan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Guinea and Tajikistan?
- 1.02 DB10-14 methodology, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Tajikistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Guinea and Tajikistan rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Guinea ranks 168th and Tajikistan ranks 171st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.