Guinea vs East Timor: Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology)
Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology) over time
- Guinea
- East Timor
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 46.19 DB10-14 methodology against 45.33 DB10-14 methodology in East Timor, a difference of 0.86 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was East Timor ahead.
Guinea ranks 168th and East Timor ranks 170th of 184 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.68 DB10-14 methodology | 41.98 DB10-14 methodology | 3.3 DB10-14 methodology | East Timor |
| 2010s | 41.72 DB10-14 methodology | 43.71 DB10-14 methodology | 1.99 DB10-14 methodology | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Guinea or East Timor?
- Guinea, at 46.19 DB10-14 methodology against 45.33 DB10-14 methodology in East Timor as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Guinea and East Timor?
- 0.86 DB10-14 methodology, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and East Timor?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Guinea and East Timor rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Guinea ranks 168th and East Timor ranks 170th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.