Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 46.19 DB10-14 methodology against 45.66 DB10-14 methodology in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.53 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Guinea ranks 168th and Zimbabwe ranks 169th of 184 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.68 DB10-14 methodology | 42.98 DB10-14 methodology | 4.3 DB10-14 methodology | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 41.72 DB10-14 methodology | 44.78 DB10-14 methodology | 3.06 DB10-14 methodology | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Guinea, at 46.19 DB10-14 methodology against 45.66 DB10-14 methodology in Zimbabwe as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 0.53 DB10-14 methodology, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Guinea ranks 168th and Zimbabwe ranks 169th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.