Indonesia vs Kuwait: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Indonesia
- Kuwait
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 61.98 DB10-14 methodology against 61.24 DB10-14 methodology in Kuwait, a difference of 0.74 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kuwait ahead.
Indonesia ranks 97th and Kuwait ranks 101st of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Kuwait in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.72 DB10-14 methodology | 60.29 DB10-14 methodology | 1.57 DB10-14 methodology | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 61.07 DB10-14 methodology | 60.68 DB10-14 methodology | 0.3965 DB10-14 methodology | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Indonesia or Kuwait?
- Indonesia, at 61.98 DB10-14 methodology against 61.24 DB10-14 methodology in Kuwait as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Indonesia and Kuwait?
- 0.74 DB10-14 methodology, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Kuwait?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Indonesia and Kuwait rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Indonesia ranks 97th and Kuwait ranks 101st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.