Indonesia vs Sri Lanka: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Indonesia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 61.98 DB10-14 methodology against 61.34 DB10-14 methodology in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.64 DB10-14 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 97th and Sri Lanka ranks 101st of 184 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.72 DB10-14 methodology | 56.98 DB10-14 methodology | 1.74 DB10-14 methodology | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 61.07 DB10-14 methodology | 58.66 DB10-14 methodology | 2.41 DB10-14 methodology | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Indonesia or Sri Lanka?
- Indonesia, at 61.98 DB10-14 methodology against 61.34 DB10-14 methodology in Sri Lanka as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Indonesia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.64 DB10-14 methodology, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Indonesia and Sri Lanka rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Indonesia ranks 97th and Sri Lanka ranks 101st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.