Iran vs Nicaragua: Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology)
Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology) over time
- Iran
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 57.98 DB10-14 methodology against 57.93 DB10-14 methodology in Iran, a difference of 0.05 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Iran ahead.
Iran ranks 121st and Nicaragua ranks 120th of 184 countries.
Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.88 DB10-14 methodology | 53.12 DB10-14 methodology | 2.76 DB10-14 methodology | Iran |
| 2010s | 56.96 DB10-14 methodology | 56.14 DB10-14 methodology | 0.8167 DB10-14 methodology | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Iran or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 57.98 DB10-14 methodology against 57.93 DB10-14 methodology in Iran as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Iran and Nicaragua?
- 0.05 DB10-14 methodology, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Nicaragua?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Iran and Nicaragua rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Iran ranks 121st and Nicaragua ranks 120th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.