South Korea vs Norway: Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology)
Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology) over time
- South Korea
- Norway
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 82.99 DB10-14 methodology against 81.94 DB10-14 methodology in Norway, a difference of 1.05 DB10-14 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 7th and Norway ranks 10th of 184 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.94 DB10-14 methodology | 80.53 DB10-14 methodology | 0.4068 DB10-14 methodology | South Korea |
| 2010s | 82.19 DB10-14 methodology | 81.24 DB10-14 methodology | 0.9435 DB10-14 methodology | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, South Korea or Norway?
- South Korea, at 82.99 DB10-14 methodology against 81.94 DB10-14 methodology in Norway as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between South Korea and Norway?
- 1.05 DB10-14 methodology, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do South Korea and Norway rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- South Korea ranks 7th and Norway ranks 10th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.