Kyrgyzstan vs Moldova: Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology)
Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 63.24 DB10-14 methodology against 63.23 DB10-14 methodology in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.01 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Moldova ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd and Moldova ranks 82nd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.2 DB10-14 methodology | 59.61 DB10-14 methodology | 0.4119 DB10-14 methodology | Moldova |
| 2010s | 61.95 DB10-14 methodology | 61.69 DB10-14 methodology | 0.2607 DB10-14 methodology | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Kyrgyzstan or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 63.24 DB10-14 methodology against 63.23 DB10-14 methodology in Kyrgyzstan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Kyrgyzstan and Moldova?
- 0.01 DB10-14 methodology, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Moldova rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd and Moldova ranks 82nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.