Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 63.23 DB10-14 methodology against 62.69 DB10-14 methodology in Namibia, a difference of 0.54 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Namibia ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd and Namibia ranks 86th of 184 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.2 DB10-14 methodology | 62.3 DB10-14 methodology | 3.11 DB10-14 methodology | Namibia |
| 2010s | 61.95 DB10-14 methodology | 62.52 DB10-14 methodology | 0.567 DB10-14 methodology | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Kyrgyzstan or Namibia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 63.23 DB10-14 methodology against 62.69 DB10-14 methodology in Namibia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 0.54 DB10-14 methodology, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Namibia rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd and Namibia ranks 86th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.