Laos vs Zimbabwe: Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology)
Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology) over time
- Laos
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 45.66 DB10-14 methodology against 45.13 DB10-14 methodology in Laos, a difference of 0.53 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 172nd and Zimbabwe ranks 169th of 184 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.25 DB10-14 methodology | 42.98 DB10-14 methodology | 1.27 DB10-14 methodology | Laos |
| 2010s | 45.65 DB10-14 methodology | 44.78 DB10-14 methodology | 0.8716 DB10-14 methodology | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Laos or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 45.66 DB10-14 methodology against 45.13 DB10-14 methodology in Laos as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 0.53 DB10-14 methodology, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Laos and Zimbabwe rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Laos ranks 172nd and Zimbabwe ranks 169th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.