Latvia vs Mauritius: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Latvia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 78.95 DB10-14 methodology against 77.85 DB10-14 methodology in Mauritius, a difference of 1.1 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mauritius ahead.
Latvia ranks 19th and Mauritius ranks 22nd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.01 DB10-14 methodology | 74.68 DB10-14 methodology | 0.6632 DB10-14 methodology | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 77.22 DB10-14 methodology | 76.3 DB10-14 methodology | 0.915 DB10-14 methodology | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Latvia or Mauritius?
- Latvia, at 78.95 DB10-14 methodology against 77.85 DB10-14 methodology in Mauritius as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Latvia and Mauritius?
- 1.1 DB10-14 methodology, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Latvia ranks 19th and Mauritius ranks 22nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.