Lebanon vs Viet Nam: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Lebanon
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 61.34 DB10-14 methodology against 61.13 DB10-14 methodology in Lebanon, a difference of 0.21 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 103rd and Viet Nam ranks 100th of 184 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.18 DB10-14 methodology | 59.51 DB10-14 methodology | 0.6715 DB10-14 methodology | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 61.02 DB10-14 methodology | 60.79 DB10-14 methodology | 0.2296 DB10-14 methodology | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Lebanon or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 61.34 DB10-14 methodology against 61.13 DB10-14 methodology in Lebanon as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Lebanon and Viet Nam?
- 0.21 DB10-14 methodology, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Lebanon and Viet Nam rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Lebanon ranks 103rd and Viet Nam ranks 100th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.