North Macedonia vs Portugal: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- North Macedonia
- Portugal
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 74.98 DB10-14 methodology against 74.47 DB10-14 methodology in Portugal, a difference of 0.51 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Portugal ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 29th and Portugal ranks 32nd of 184 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.86 DB10-14 methodology | 70.73 DB10-14 methodology | 3.87 DB10-14 methodology | Portugal |
| 2010s | 70.93 DB10-14 methodology | 73.95 DB10-14 methodology | 3.02 DB10-14 methodology | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, North Macedonia or Portugal?
- North Macedonia, at 74.98 DB10-14 methodology against 74.47 DB10-14 methodology in Portugal as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between North Macedonia and Portugal?
- 0.51 DB10-14 methodology, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Portugal?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do North Macedonia and Portugal rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- North Macedonia ranks 29th and Portugal ranks 32nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.