North Macedonia vs Thailand: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- North Macedonia
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 75.32 DB10-14 methodology against 74.98 DB10-14 methodology in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.34 DB10-14 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 29th and Thailand ranks 27th of 184 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.86 DB10-14 methodology | 73.76 DB10-14 methodology | 6.9 DB10-14 methodology | Thailand |
| 2010s | 70.93 DB10-14 methodology | 74.55 DB10-14 methodology | 3.62 DB10-14 methodology | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, North Macedonia or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 75.32 DB10-14 methodology against 74.98 DB10-14 methodology in North Macedonia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between North Macedonia and Thailand?
- 0.34 DB10-14 methodology, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do North Macedonia and Thailand rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- North Macedonia ranks 29th and Thailand ranks 27th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.