Palau vs Papua New Guinea: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Palau
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Palau currently reports 58.53 DB10-14 methodology against 58.24 DB10-14 methodology in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.29 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Palau ranks 118th and Papua New Guinea ranks 119th of 184 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Palau | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.05 DB10-14 methodology | 57.83 DB10-14 methodology | 3.78 DB10-14 methodology | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 55 DB10-14 methodology | 57.88 DB10-14 methodology | 2.88 DB10-14 methodology | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Palau or Papua New Guinea?
- Palau, at 58.53 DB10-14 methodology against 58.24 DB10-14 methodology in Papua New Guinea as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Palau and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.29 DB10-14 methodology, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Papua New Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Palau and Papua New Guinea rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Palau ranks 118th and Papua New Guinea ranks 119th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.