Sao Tome and Principe vs Sudan: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 50.05 DB10-14 methodology against 49.84 DB10-14 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.21 DB10-14 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 147th and Sudan ranks 146th of 184 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.37 DB10-14 methodology | 47.68 DB10-14 methodology | 5.31 DB10-14 methodology | Sudan |
| 2010s | 46.03 DB10-14 methodology | 49.04 DB10-14 methodology | 3.01 DB10-14 methodology | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Sao Tome and Principe or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 50.05 DB10-14 methodology against 49.84 DB10-14 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Sao Tome and Principe and Sudan?
- 0.21 DB10-14 methodology, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sudan rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 147th and Sudan ranks 146th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.