Senegal vs East Timor: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Senegal
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 45.33 DB10-14 methodology against 44.67 DB10-14 methodology in Senegal, a difference of 0.66 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Senegal ahead.
Senegal ranks 173rd and East Timor ranks 170th of 184 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.04 DB10-14 methodology | 41.98 DB10-14 methodology | 1.06 DB10-14 methodology | Senegal |
| 2010s | 43.96 DB10-14 methodology | 43.71 DB10-14 methodology | 0.2472 DB10-14 methodology | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Senegal or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 45.33 DB10-14 methodology against 44.67 DB10-14 methodology in Senegal as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Senegal and East Timor?
- 0.66 DB10-14 methodology, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and East Timor?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Senegal and East Timor rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Senegal ranks 173rd and East Timor ranks 170th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.