Sri Lanka vs Vietnam: Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology)
Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Vietnam
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 61.34 DB10-14 methodology against 61.34 DB10-14 methodology in Vietnam, a difference of 0 DB10-14 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Vietnam has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 101st and Vietnam ranks 100th of 184 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.98 DB10-14 methodology | 59.51 DB10-14 methodology | 2.53 DB10-14 methodology | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 58.66 DB10-14 methodology | 60.79 DB10-14 methodology | 2.13 DB10-14 methodology | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Sri Lanka or Vietnam?
- Sri Lanka, at 61.34 DB10-14 methodology against 61.34 DB10-14 methodology in Vietnam as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Sri Lanka and Vietnam?
- 0 DB10-14 methodology, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Vietnam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Sri Lanka and Vietnam rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Sri Lanka ranks 101st and Vietnam ranks 100th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.