Central African Republic vs South Sudan: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Central African Republic
- South Sudan
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 35.57 DB17-20 methodology against 34.62 DB17-20 methodology in South Sudan, a difference of 0.95 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was South Sudan ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 185th and South Sudan ranks 186th of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Central African Republic or South Sudan?
- Central African Republic, at 35.57 DB17-20 methodology against 34.62 DB17-20 methodology in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Central African Republic and South Sudan?
- 0.95 DB17-20 methodology, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and South Sudan rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Central African Republic ranks 185th and South Sudan ranks 186th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.